MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4241066329 · doi:10.1016/s0306-3747(15)30173-1

Clariant posts mixed results for third quarter of 2015

2015· article· en· W4241066329 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAdditives for Polymers · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicDiverse Perspectives in Modern Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Agricultural economicsBusinessEconomicsCommerceGeographyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Switzerland's speciality chemicals group Clariant International Ltd reported sales of CHF1.41 billion (€1.30 billion) for the third quarter of 2015, a decline of 6% in Swiss franc terms from sales of CHF1.507 billion in 3Q 2014. However, the sales total represented growth of 2% in local currencies, with both volumes and prices up 1%, the company says. Net income from continuing operations was CHF60 million in 3Q 2015, up 3% from the previous year.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.021
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.093
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.133
Threshold uncertainty score0.446

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0210.093
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0060.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0100.004
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1330.062

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdditives for PolymersSame topicDiverse Perspectives in Modern StudiesFrench-language works237,207