MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4241068730 · doi:10.5194/acp-2020-1134

Soot-PCF: Pore condensation and freezing framework for sootaggregates

2020· preprint· en· W4241068730 on OpenAlexaff
Claudia Marcolli, Fabian Mahrt, B. Kärcher

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersH2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie ActionsEuropean Commission
KeywordsSootIce nucleusIce crystalsCirrusNucleationAerosolParticle (ecology)CondensationChemical physicsCloud condensation nucleiMaterials scienceRelative humidityTroposphereMineralogyChemical engineeringChemistryAtmospheric sciencesThermodynamicsGeologyMeteorologyCombustionPhysical chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. How ice crystals form in the troposphere strongly affects cirrus cloud properties. Atmospheric ice formation is often initiated by aerosol particles that act as ice nucleating particles. The aerosol-cloud interactions of soot and associated feedbacks remain uncertain, in part because a coherent understanding of the ice nucleation mechanism and activity of soot has not yet emerged. Here, we provide a new framework that predicts ice formation on soot particles via pore condensation and freezing (PCF) that, unlike previous approaches, considers soot particle properties capturing their vastly different pore properties compared to other aerosol species such as mineral dust. During PCF, water is taken up below water saturation into pores on soot aggregates by capillary condensation. At cirrus temperatures, pore water can freeze homogeneously and subsequently grow into a macroscopic ice crystal. In the soot-PCF framework presented here, the relative humidity conditions required for these steps are derived for different pore types as a function of temperature. The pore types considered here evolve from idealized stacking of equally sized primary particles, either in tetrahedral or cubic packing arrangements. Specifically, we encompass n-membered ring pores that form between n individual spheres within the same layer of primary particles as well as pores in the form of inner cavities that form between two layers of primary particles. We treat soot primary particles as perfect spheres and use the contact angle between soot and water (θsw), the primary particle diameter (Dpp) and the degree of primary particle overlap (overlap coefficient, Cov) to characterize soot pore properties. We find that n-membered ring pores are the dominant pore structures for soot-PCF, as they are common features of soot aggregates and have a suitable geometry for both, filling with water and growing ice below water saturation. We focus our analysis on three-membered and four-membered ring pores as they are of the right size for PCF assuming primary particle sizes typical for atmospheric soot particles. For these pore types, we derive equations that describe the conditions for all three steps of soot-PCF, namely capillary condensation, ice nucleation, and ice growth. Since at typical cirrus conditions homogeneous ice nucleation can be considered immediate as soon as the water volume within the pore is large enough to host a critical ice embryo, soot-PCF becomes either limited by capillary condensation or ice crystal growth. For instance, our results show that at typical cirrus temperatures of T = 220 K, three-membered ring pores formed between primary particles with θsw = 60°, Dpp = 20 nm, and Cov = 0.05 are ice growth limited, as the ice requires a relative humidity with respect to ice of RHi = 137 % to grow out of the pore, while a sufficient volume of pore water for ice nucleation has condensed already at RHi = 86 %. Conversely, four-membered ring pores with the same primary particle size and an overlap coefficient of Cov = 0.1 are capillary condensation limited as they require RHi = 129 % to gather enough water for ice nucleation, compared with only 124 % RHi, required for ice growth. We use the soot-PCF framework to derive a new equation to parameterize of ice formation on soot particles via PCF. This equation is based on soot properties that are routinely measured, including the primary particle size and overlap, and the fractal dimension. These properties, along with the number of primary particles making up an aggregate and the contact angle between water and soot, constrain the parameterization. Applying the new parameterization to previously reported laboratory data of ice formation on soot particles provides direct evidence that ice nucleation on soot aggregates takes place via PCF. We conclude that this new framework clarifies the ice formation mechanism on soot particles at cirrus conditions and provides a new perspective to represent ice formation on soot in climate models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols→French-language works237,207→