MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4241075441 · doi:10.1108/oxan-db244329

Mexico’s domestic policies jeopardise economic growth

2019· other· en· W4241075441 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEmerald expert briefings · 2019
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEnergy, Environment, Economic Growth
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)EconomicsInflation (cosmology)Investment (military)Depreciation (economics)Economic policyMandateEconomic growthPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Subject Slow growth. Significance Mexico’s economy took an unexpected plunge during the first quarter of 2019, contracting by 0.2% quarter-on-quarter. The slowdown is becoming more widespread amid declines in industrial production and services. All major international financial institutions, the Bank of Mexico and even the Ministry of Finance have slashed their growth forecasts for this year to around 1.6%. President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador (AMLO)’s promise to achieve an average annual growth rate of 4% over his six-year mandate -- more than double Mexico’s sluggish average rate for the last decade -- is looking increasingly unobtainable. Impacts Risk of a US-Mexico trade war has seen peso depreciation and, if sustained, will hit investment and inflation, ultimately harming growth. Public spending cuts will hit investment projects, with private investment, hampered by falling confidence, unlikely to fill the gap. AMLO’s energy policy may weaken the finances of Pemex; downgrades for both Pemex and the sovereign cannot be ruled out. Inflation risks remain to the upside, mainly due to peso weakness and wage pressures, reducing the chances of an early rate cut.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score0.152

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEmerald expert briefingsSame topicEnergy, Environment, Economic GrowthFrench-language works237,207