Muscarinic activation of transient inward current and contraction in canine colon circular smooth muscle cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Muscarinic receptor mediated membrane currents and contractions were studied in isolated canine colon circular smooth muscle cells. Carbachol (105M) evoked a slow transient inward current that was superimposed by a transient outward current at holding potentials greater than 50 mV. Carbachol contracted the cells by 70 ± 2%. The effects of carbachol were blocked by atropine (106M), tetraethyl ammonium (20 mM), and BAPTA-AM (25 mM applied for 20 min). The inward current and contraction were not sensitive to diltiazem (105M), nitrendipine (3 × 107M), niflumic acid (105M), or N-phenylanthranilic acid (104M), but were gradually inhibited after repetitive stimulations in Ca2+free solution. Ni2+(2 mM) inhibited the inward current by 67 ± 4%. The inward current reversed at +15 mV. The outward component could be selectively inhibited by iberiotoxin (20 nM) or by intracellular Cs+. Repeated stimulation in the presence of cyclopiazonic acid (CPA, 3 µM) inhibited the carbachol-induced outward current and partially inhibited contraction. CPA did not inhibit the inward current. In conclusion, muscarinic receptor stimulation evoked a CPA-sensitive calcium release that caused contraction and a CPA-insensitive transient inward current was activated that is primarily carried by Ca2+ions and is sensitive to Ni2+.Key words: calcium, carbachol, smooth muscle, cyclopiazonic acid, sarcoplasmic reticulum.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".