MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4241113535 · doi:10.1079/fc.20717.20210115071

<i>Elaeagnus angustifolia</i> (Russian olive).

2021· preprint· en· W4241113535 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Philip Weyl, Nick Pasiecznik

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhytochemical and Pharmacological Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShrubTaprootGerminationAridDeciduousGeographyBiologyHabitBotanyHorticultureEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<title>Abstract</title> <italic>E. angustifolia</italic> is a tall shrub (up to 15 m and 1 m d.b.h.), with a dense, rounded crown, native to Europe and Asia and an important deciduous species of arid and semi-arid areas of northwestern China. It was introduced into the USA in the early 1900s, and has now become extensively naturalized in riparian areas of western states bordered on the east by North and South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma and Texas (Olson and Knopf, 1986a, 1986b; Shafroth et al., 1995). It also occurs in southern Canada from Ontario to British Columbia. It grows in some eastern USA states, but is not naturalized (Tesky, 1992). This fast-growing (up to 1.8 m per year), nitrogen-fixing species has silver-grey leaves with entire margins (4.5-9 cm), olive-shaped fruit and long thorns. The branches are flexible, pubescent (grey and scaly) and often have a short thorn at the end. The bark is brown, thin with shallow fissures, peeling in long strips. It has a deep taproot and well-developed lateral root system. The small, yellow flowers occur in late spring and have a distinctive spicy aroma. Trees produce seed after 3-5 years, with birds and small mammals dispersing them in their droppings. The seeds can remain viable for up to 3 years and are capable of germinating over a broad range of soil types (Knopf and Olson, 1984). Germination is enhanced by stratification in moist sand for 90 days at 41°C (Vines, 1960). <italic>E. angustifolia</italic> is found in a range of environments as it is tolerant of drought and saline, alkaline or infertile soils (Vines, 1960; Olson and Knopf, 1986a, 1986b), and has a well-developed root system. It is commonly found growing along floodplains, river banks, stream courses, marshes and irrigation ditches in the western states of the USA, and in desert or dry (150 mm annual rainfall) areas of Western Asia. It bears few fruits if the annual precipitation is &gt;400 mm and also grows slowly if the water table is below 4 m. <italic>E. angustifolia</italic> is mainly established from seed, although cuttings are used in areas with sufficient moisture. It is relatively shade-tolerant once established and can withstand competition from other shrubs and trees, and can become a dominant climax species, replacing native cottonwoods and willows along water courses in the USA. <italic>E. angustifolia</italic> has been widely planted in shelterbelts, windbreaks or protective plantings as it is hardy, adaptable to a wide range of soil and moisture conditions and has a dense growth form (Brothers, 1988). It has also been used to revegetate land contaminated by paper mill wastewater (Wagner et al., 1994), potassium (Heinze and Liebmann, 1998) and bentonite (Uresk and Yamamoto, 1994), mine spoilings and as a bioindicator of heavy metal pollution (Aksoy and Sahin, 1999). The timber is hard and brownish-yellow with a beautiful grain, being similar to that of white elm (<italic>Ulmus pumila, U. americana</italic>). It can be used to make farm tools, furniture and for mining poles and civil construction. The fruits and leaves are valuable for food and animal fodder, whilst the tree is considered a good source for bee foraging. The leaves, shoots, flowers, fruits and bark have been traditionally used in Chinese medicine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.575
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhytochemical and Pharmacological StudiesFrench-language works237,207