MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4241125964 · doi:10.4000/rsr.1240

Pierrette Daviau, Élisabeth Parmentier, Marthe et Marie en concurrence ? Des Pères de l’Église aux commentaires féministes

2013· article· fr· W4241125964 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Denis Fricker

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue des sciences religieuses · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMilitary, Security, and Education Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesConcurrencePhilosophyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pierrette Daviau, théologienne pratique, catholique canadienne, et Élisabeth Parmentier, son homologue protestante française, associent leurs compétences pour analyser des commentaires de l’épisode évangélique qui narre la visite de Jésus chez Marthe et Marie (Lc 10,38-42). Il en résulte cet ouvrage de dimension abordable pour un public élargi. Le vocabulaire employé évite d’ailleurs les termes trop techniques, sans que pour autant les discussions complexes soient éludées. Les deux A. privilé...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.117

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0160.018
Scholarly communication0.0090.008
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0050.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.114
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue des sciences religieusesSame topicMilitary, Security, and Education StudiesFrench-language works237,207