MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

DISKRIMINASI DALAM HUKUM PERKAWINAN (PENELITIAN ATAS HUKUM PERKAWINAN ADAT SUKU NIAS)

2017· article· id· W4241144291 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMASALAH-MASALAH HUKUM · 2017
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMarriage and Family Dynamics
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kewajiban negara di bawah CEDAW, antara lain, adalah untuk menghilangkan diskriminasi terhadap perempuan dalam perkawinan menurut Pasal 16 dan menjamin hak-hak perempuan pedesaan menurut pasal 14. Penelitian ini mencoba untuk menemukan diskriminasi terhadap perempuan dalam hukum adat perkawinan Nias dan kewajiban Negara berdasarkan Konvensi CEDAW. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa persyaratan dan pelaksanaan Nias perkawinan hukum adat telah melanggar UU Perkawinan di Indonesia dan berdampak pada adanya diskriminasi terhadap hak-hak perempuan dalam perkawinan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.691
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0080.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it