Gold along Cordilleran faults: Key characteristics and analogies between Phanerozoic and Archean settings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Several gold deposits and prospects in the Canadian Cordillera of British Columbia and Yukon are associated, at least spatially, to major fault zones. The Llewellyn fault and Tally Ho shear zone region of northwestern British Columbia and southern Yukon is the locus of a series of vein-hosted gold prospects and deposits, including the past-producing Engineer and Mount Skukum mines. Many of these gold occurrences have epithermal polymetallic signatures, although some are considered mesothermal-orogenic, as such related to first-order crustal breaks and synchronous magmatism. However, the temporal and genetic relationships between the orogenic- and epithermal-style systems along the Llewellyn fault and Tally Ho shear zone remain to be clearly established. Reconnaissance work has underlined a three-part relationship between these large-scale structures, gold mineralization and Eocene magmatic complexes. Characterization of Llewellyn fault zone in the Bennett Plateau and Tagish Lake area of British Columbia, and of the Tally Ho shear zone in the Tally Ho Mountain, Gold Hill and Mount Hodnett areas of Yukon, and of their spatially associated gold mineralization, aims to test this model and ultimately draw comparisons with the much older, structurally controlled gold deposits of the Archean and Paleoproterozoic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".