MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4241213698 · doi:10.1017/9781108526227.005

Building Engineered Membranes, Devices, and Experimental Results

2018· book-chapter· en· W4241213698 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2018
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Analysis and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMembraneNanotechnologyMaterials scienceChemistryEngineeringComputer scienceBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Part II of this book deals with the construction, formation, and operation of engineered tethered membrane devices. Detailed descriptions are provided on the molecular components of engineered membranes, methods for inserting peptides and proteins, and how to measure the structure and dynamics of these biomimetic devices. Four biomimetic devices built out of engineered tethered membranes are discussed: the ion-channel switch (ICS) biosensor, the electroporation measurement platform (EMP), the electrophysiological response platform (ERP), and the pore formation measurement platform (PFMP). Several real-world examples are provided such as how the ICS biosensor can be used for the rapid detection of influenza A, how the PFMP can be used to infer the pore-formation dynamics of the antimicrobial peptide PGLa (peptidylglycylleucine- carboxyamide), how the EMP can be used to study the membrane conductance dynamics, and how the ERP can be used as a noninvasive method for measuring the response of ion channels and cells. We also discuss how to perform experimental measurements using engineered tethered membranes to determine the structure and dynamics of the membrane and macromolecules in the membrane. The experimental techniques discussed include electrical measurements, and spectroscopy and imaging techniques (e.g., X-radiation refractometry, neutron reflectometry, fluorescence recovery after photobleaching, and nuclear magnetic resonance). These measurement methods not only yield important biological details about the membrane but also verify its structure. Since engineered tethered membranes mimic real biological membranes, the experimental studies reported involving antimicrobial peptides, electroporation, growth of cells, and other properties of the membrane give significant insight into how biological membranes function. Parts II and III of the book together give a complete account of how to engineer artificial membranes: building them, mathematically modeling their dynamics, and interpreting and refining their design. The reader interested in mathematical modeling of engineered membranes can read §4.1, §§5.1–5.4, and parts of Chapter 6 before proceeding to Part III. For a laboratory exercise on building engineered tethered membranes, refer to §4.4.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooksSame topicStructural Analysis and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207