MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4241217779 · doi:10.1149/ma2017-02/32/1432

Phosphoric Acid Distribution Patterns in High Temperature PEM Fuel Cells

2017· article· en· W4241217779 on OpenAlexaff
Nico Bevilacqua, Michael G. George, Aimy Bazylak, Roswitha Zeis

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhosphoric acidProton exchange membrane fuel cellElectrolyteTriple phase boundaryMaterials scienceElectrodeMembrane electrode assemblyElectrochemistryChemical engineeringCatalysisAtmospheric temperature rangePhase (matter)Operating temperatureAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistrySolid oxide fuel cellChromatographyElectrical engineeringOrganic chemistryThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the proton conducting medium, phosphoric acid plays a vital role in high temperature PEM fuel cells (HT-PEMFC) operating in the temperature range from 140-200°C. The acid is introduced into the fuel cell by doping the polybenzimidazole (PBI) membrane, and it migrates into the catalyst layer (CL) when the cell is assembled. The acid distribution continues during the activation phase and is influenced by operating conditions such as the cell temperature, reactant flowrates, current density, and electrode potential. The electrochemical active surface area (ECSA), which is critical for the fuel cell performance, is determined by the triple-phase boundary (the common boundary of the catalyst particles, the reactant gases, and the phosphoric acid). Due to the liquid state of the phosphoric acid electrolyte, the triple-phase boundary of the HT-PEMFC may evolve continuously during the cell operation. For better control of this dynamic process, HT-PEMFCs are usually constructed with thick electrodes (≈ 100 µm) and a relatively high platinum loading (≈ 1 mgPt/cm2). A better understanding of the acid distribution patterns would help improve the electrode designs and lower the cost by reducing the Pt loading. In this work, we investigate the distribution of phosphoric acid in gas diffusion electrodes (GDE). The study combines imaging techniques (micro-computed tomography or µCT, FIB-SEM) with modeling (Pore Network Modeling or PNM). To validate the application of PNM, phosphoric acid was injected into different GDEs and the invasion pattern was investigated. The samples were mounted in a sample holder emulating a rib and channel structure, and they were inspected using µCT. The reconstructed 3D image stacks were subsequently segmented into void-, carbon fiber-, MPL-, and CL-voxels1, and the segmented images were then reconstructed into a 3D pore network2. This pore network contains the real shapes of the pores and throats, and therefore the flow characteristics are still representative of the real sample3. The quality of the extracted network is solely limited by the quality of the µCT images. Invasion percolation simulations were performed using the open source package OpenPNM to predict the distribution of phosphoric acid inside GDEs, showing the effect of network parameters on the invasion pattern. We found that the experimentally observed invasion patterns agree very well with the pore network simulation and that invasion percolation is a valid approach to investigate phosphoric acid distributions in GDEs4. The presence of an MPL restricts the intrusion of phosphoric acid into the carbon fiber substrate and significantly reduces the saturation. Figure 1 shows the simulated phosphoric acid invasion pattern into a densely woven carbon fiber layer. The pathway is tortuous and exhibits capillary fingering, and the acid is creeping alongside the bottom of the rib of the sample holder until it emerges into the channel. These observations are all consistent with experiments. References 1. Banerjee, R. et al. Heterogeneous porosity distributions of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell gas diffusion layer materials with rib-channel compression. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 41,14885–14896 (2016). 2. Hinebaugh, J. & Bazylak, A. Pore Network Modeling to Study the Effects of Common Assumptions in GDL Liquid Water Invasion Studies. ESFuelCell 201291466 (2012). 3. Gostick, J. et al. OpenPNM: A Pore Network Modeling Package. Comput. Sci. Eng. 18,60–74 (2016). 4. Chevalier, S. et al. Role of the microporous layer in the redistribution of phosphoric acid in high temperature PEM fuel cell gas diffusion electrodes. Electrochimica acta, 212 , 187-194. (2016). Figure 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicFuel Cells and Related MaterialsFrench-language works237,207