MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4241262413 · doi:10.1109/cpem.1996.547175

An improved three phase digital recorder system for calibrating power instrumentation

2002· article· en· W4241262413 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Electrical Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWaveformHarmonicInstrumentation (computer programming)VoltageAC powerCalibrationElectrical engineeringSystem of measurementPower (physics)Harmonic analysisMultimeterElectronic engineeringCurrent (fluid)EngineeringComputer scienceAcousticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper describes an improved digital recorder system which is being used to measure accurately voltage, current, active, reactive and apparent powers and harmonic quantities for three phase sinusoidal and non-sinusoidal calibrations. The system has been designed to be used in the laboratory at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) or transported on-site for tests in electrical utility facilities. Preliminary tests have shown that for sinusoidal waveforms, the accuracy of the voltage and current measurements of the digital recorder is better than 30 ppm and better than 50 ppm for active, reactive and apparent power measurements (with respect to full scale). The accuracy of the system for harmonic measurements is related to the harmonic content of the test waveforms and is estimated for individual tests.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.924
Threshold uncertainty score0.441

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it