MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4241287821 · doi:10.5194/bg-2018-134

Impacts of anthropogenic inputs on the hypoxia and oxygen dynamics in the Pearl River Estuary

2018· preprint· en· W4241287821 on OpenAlexaff
Bin Wang, Jiatang Hu, Shiyu Li, Liuqian Yu, Jia Huang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal ecosystems
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsEstuaryHypoxia (environmental)AerationEnvironmental scienceNutrientParticulatesBiogeochemical cycleSedimentTotal organic carbonHydrology (agriculture)Particulate organic carbonOxygenSink (geography)Environmental chemistryOceanographyEcologyGeologyChemistryPhytoplanktonBiologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. In summer, the Pearl River Estuary experiences hypoxia, largely driven by the high input of freshwater with low dissolved oxygen (DO) and abundant nutrients and particulate organic carbon from the Pearl River network. In this study, we used a well-validated coupled physical-biogeochemical model to study the response of hypoxia and oxygen dynamics to variations of anthropogenic inputs (i.e. DO, nutrients, and particulate organic carbon). Model results showed that hypoxia in the Pearl River Estuary was confined to the shelf off the Modaomen sub-estuary with a hypoxic area of ~ 200 km2 mainly due to the combined effect of re-aeration and sediment oxygen demand. Numerical experiments suggested that hypoxia in the Pearl River Estuary was most sensitive to riverine inputs of particulate organic carbon , followed by DO concentrations and nutrients. Specifically, a 50 % decrease (increase) in riverine input of particulate organic carbon led to a 47 % decrease (64 % increase) in hypoxic area, with the sediment oxygen demand and water column production being the two most important processes contributing to the changes in DO concentration and hypoxic extent. Changes in the riverine inputs of DO and nutrients had little impact on the simulated hypoxia because of the buffering effects of re-aeration, i.e. the re-aeration compensated the changes in surface apparent oxygen utilization (AOU) associated with river-induced variations of oxygen source and sink processes. The Pearl River Estuary features shallow waters (with averaged depth of 10 m) where oxygen provided by the re-aeration could penetrate to bottom waters via vertical diffusion that largely offset the changes in DO contributed by other oxygen source and sink processes. This study highlights the importance of re-aeration in determining the hypoxic extent and the buffering effects of re-aeration in reducing hypoxia variability in shallow estuary.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMarine and coastal ecosystems→French-language works237,207→