Parental decisions following prenatal diagnosis of sex chromosome aneuploidy: a trend over time
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Research over the last 20 years has considerably changed the understanding of the natural history and prognosis for individuals with a diagnosis of sex chromosome aneuploidy (SCA). A cross-sectional retrospective analysis of factors influencing parental decisions following a prenatal diagnosis of SCA during the time period of 1971–97 was performed. The records of 169 fetuses with a prenatal karyotype of 45,X, 47,XXX, 47,XXY, and 47,XYY were reviewed. Mosaic karyotypes for SCA were also included. Information reviewed involved: parental decision, the type of SCA, the presence or absence of mosaicism, the presence or absence of a fetal anomaly diagnosed by ultrasound examination, indication for prenatal diagnosis, prenatal procedure performed, parental age, marital status, previous pregnancy history, family history, ethnicity, religion, education, and profession. A significant correlation was found between the decision to continue a pregnancy and the type of SCA and the presence of fetal abnormalities on ultrasound examination. In addition, this study examined differences in parental decisions over time for the years in question. A statistically significant trend was observed with a higher rate of pregnancy continuation in the more recent years. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".