Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Anglophone economic geography has played a central role in the evolution of human geography, including its various philosophical and theoretical shifts, from neocolonial commercial geography, through regional economic geography, spatial science, and location theory, to Marxism, feminism, and poststructuralism. It is currently extremely diverse, reflecting the breadth of approaches in the discipline, including a variety of quantitative and qualitative methodologies. This diversity is a strength rather than a weakness, if approached in the spirit of engaged pluralism. Perhaps the discipline's principal contemporary unifying theme is the commitment by the majority of its practitioners to some aspect of a geographical political economy – to the idea that capitalism is an unstable, conflict‐ridden political economic system characterized by geographically uneven development, whose spatiotemporal evolution is shaped by reciprocal relations between political‐economic, cultural, and biophysical processes. Major current areas of research in anglophone economic geography include geographies of production and consumption, labor relations and the body, governance and regulation, financialization, nature–economy relations, globalization and development, and diverse (more than capitalist) economies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it