MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4241354719 · doi:10.1093/pch/16.9.535

Pharmacokinetics 101

2011· article· en· W4241354719 on OpenAlexaff
Shinya Ito

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThermoregulation and physiological responses
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPharmacokineticsMedicinePharmacology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

B asic pharmacokinetics (PK) knowledge and skills are essential in practicing therapeutics. Compared with physicians, pharmacists receive intense PK training through their professional education; therefore, they are far advanced in their capability of interpreting and assessing the pharmaceutical part of therapeutic management of patients. Some may argue that those of us in the medical profession do not need to have such PK skills. My position on this issue, however, is very clear: Physicians must have basic knowledge and skills in PK aspects of therapeutics. This will help us maximize the effectiveness of our therapeutic management of patients, which will no doubt help us gain the confidence of patients and their families. In the present article, my focus is on PK in children, particularly clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (Vd). In parallel, I will discuss basic PK concepts that can be applied to all age groups in everyday clinical practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.845
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations64
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicThermoregulation and physiological responsesFrench-language works237,207