MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4241375682 · doi:10.18280/rcma.303-403

Preparation of Kevlar-49 Fabric/E-Glass Fabric/Epoxy Composite Materials and Characterization of Their Mechanical Properties

2020· article· en· W4241375682 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mohamad Ibrahim, Hussein Yousef Habib, Rafi Mousa Jabrah

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue des composites et des matériaux avancés · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSilicone and Siloxane Chemistry
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKevlarEpoxyComposite materialMaterials scienceComposite numberComposite epoxy materialCharacterization (materials science)Nanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Composite materials have been prepared using Kevlar and glass fabrics as reinforcement materials and epoxy resin as a matrix. The best ratio of epoxy in the Kevlar fabric/Epoxy and glass fabric/epoxy composites was determined in terms of their mechanical properties. Then, surface treatments of Kevlar fabric have been done using phosphoric acid to investigate their effect on Kevlar fabric/Epoxy composite material mechanical properties. The impact and tensile properties of the Kevlar/Epoxy composite material have been improved, and their Young's modulus increased by 38%. After that, hybrid composite materials were prepared using Kevlar and glass fabrics and epoxy. The mechanical properties of the prepared hybrid composite materials have also been studied (impact and tensile testing) in relation to composition and surface treatments. Finally, the results have been studied in order to determine the optimal preparation conditions for obtaining suitable composite material in terms of weight, mechanical properties, and cost.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.934

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue des composites et des matériaux avancésSame topicSilicone and Siloxane ChemistryFrench-language works237,207