MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4241378710 · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv.12501281

Basal Plane Activation in Monolayer MoTe2 for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction via Phase Boundaries

2020· preprint· en· W4241378710 on OpenAlexafffund
Yiqing Chen, Pengfei Ou, Xiaohan Bie, Jun Song

Bibliographic record

VenueChemRxiv · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
Topic2D Materials and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersCompute CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsMonolayerBasal planeHydrogenChemistryCatalysisAdsorptionPhase boundaryChemical physicsPhase (matter)Reactivity (psychology)CrystallographyMaterials scienceNanotechnologyPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>Two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides (2D TMDCs) have attracted tremendous interest as one prominent material group promising inexpensive <a>electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction (HER)</a>. In the present study, using <a>monolayer MoTe<sub>2</sub> as a representative, we demonstrated that </a>phase boundaries can provide a viable pathway to activate the basal plane of 2D TMDCs for enhanced HER performance. Comprehensive first-principles calculations have been performed to examine the energetics and structural stabilities of possible 2H/1T’ phase boundary configurations. Three categories of sites, Te, Mo and hollow sites, have been identified in energetically stable phase boundaries, as potential catalytic centers for HER, all indicating enhanced HER activity than the pristine basal lattice. In particular, the hollow sites, a new group of sites induced by phase boundaries, show great promise by exhibiting a Gibbs free energy near the thermoneutral value for hydrogen adsorption, comparable to that of Pt. The mechanisms underlying hydrogen adsorption at phase boundaries were then revealed, shown to be attributed to the unique local hydrogen adsorption geometries and electronic structures at phase boundaries. Our study clarifies the important mechanistic aspects underlying hydrogen activation at phase boundaries, providing valuable theoretical insights towards designing new class of high-performance HER electrocatalysts based on 2D TMDCs.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemRxivSame topic2D Materials and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207