Bibliographic record
Abstract
State-of-the-art multiprocessor cache hierarchies propagate the use of a fixed granularity in the cache organization to the design of the coherence protocol. Unfortunately, the fixed granularity, generally chosen to match average spatial locality across a range of applications, not only results in wasted bandwidth to serve an individual thread's access needs, but also results in unnecessary coherence traffic for shared data. The additional bandwidth has a direct impact on both the scalability of parallel applications and overall energy consumption. In this paper, we present the design of Protozoa, a family of coherence protocols that eliminate unnecessary coherence traffic and match data movement to an application's spatial locality. Protozoa continues to maintain metadata at a conventional fixed cache line granularity while 1) supporting variable read and write caching granularity so that data transfer matches application spatial granularity, 2) invalidating at the granularity of the write miss request so that readers to disjoint data can co-exist with writers, and 3) potentially supporting multiple non-overlapping writers within the cache line, thereby avoiding the traditional ping-pong effect of both read-write and write-write false sharing. Our evaluation demonstrates that Protozoa consistently reduce miss rate and improve the fraction of transmitted data that is actually utilized.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".