MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4241422897 · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-14-s2-p110

Evaluation of an Emergency Department Lean Process Improvement Program to reduce length of stay

2014· article· en· W4241422897 on OpenAlexaffabout
Marian J. Vermeulen, Thérèse A. Stukel, Astrid Guttmann, Brian H. Rowe, Merrick Zwarenstein, Brian Golden, Amit Nigam, Geoff Anderson, Robert S. Bell, Michael J. Schull

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Health Services Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPatient Safety and Medication Errors
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of TorontoWestern UniversityInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHealth administrationEmergency departmentNursing researchHealth informaticsPublic healthMedical emergencyEmergency medicineNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, Lean principles have been applied to improve wait times in the Emergency Department (ED). In 2009, an ED Process Improvement Program based on Lean methods was introduced in Ontario as part of a broad strategy to reduce ED length of stay (LOS) and improve patient flow. This study sought to determine the effect of this program on ED wait times and quality of care. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all ED visits at program and control sites over 3 program waves from April 1, 2007 to June 30, 2011 in Ontario, Canada. Time series analyses of outcomes before and after the program and difference-in-differences analyses comparing changes in program sites with control sites were conducted. In before-after models among program sites alone, 90 percentile ED LOS did not change in Wave 1 (-14 minutes [95% CI -47, 20]) but decreased after Wave 2 (-87 [95% CI -108, -66]) and Wave 3 (-33 [95% CI -50, -17]); median ED LOS decreased after Wave 1 (-18 [95% CI -24, -12]), Wave 2 (-23 [95% CI -27, -19]), and Wave 3 (-15 [95% CI -18, -12]); in all Waves, decreases were observed in time to physician assessment, left without being seen rates, and 72-hour ED revisit rates. In the difference-in-difference models, where changes in program sites were compared with controls, the program was associated with no change in the 90 percentile ED LOS in Wave 2 (17 [95% CI -0.2, 33]) and increases in Wave1 (23 [95% CI 0.9, 45] and Wave 3 (31 [95% CI 10, 51]); modest reductions in median ED LOS in Waves 2 and 3 alone; and a decrease in time to physician assessment in Wave 3 alone. Although the program reduced ED waiting times, it appeared that its benefits were diminished or disappeared when compared with control sites, which were exposed to system-wide initiatives such as public reporting and pay-for-performance. This study suggests that further evaluation of the effectiveness of Lean methods in the ED is warranted before widespread implementation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.158

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.230
GPT teacher head0.607
Teacher spread0.376 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Health Services ResearchSame topicPatient Safety and Medication ErrorsFrench-language works237,207