MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4241446080 · doi:10.32920/ryerson.14652852.v1

Sequential Monte Carlo methods for multi-sensor tracking with applications to radar systems

2021· preprint· en· W4241446080 on OpenAlexaff
Alon Shalev Housfater

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParticle filterInitializationComputer scienceAsynchronous communicationSensor fusionTracking (education)Monte Carlo methodRadar trackerRadarAlgorithmAuxiliary particle filterFilter (signal processing)Tracking systemConvergence (economics)Real-time computingArtificial intelligenceKalman filterComputer visionExtended Kalman filterMathematicsEnsemble Kalman filterTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this thesis is to explore specific sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) methods and their application to the unique demands of radar and bearing only tracking systems. Asynchronous radar networks are of special interest and a novel algorithm, the multiple imputation particle filter (MIPF), is formulated to perform data fusion and estimation using asynchronous observations. Convergence analysis is carried out to show that the algorithm will converge to the optimal filter. Simulations are performed to demonstrate the effectiveness of this filter. Next, the problem of multi-sensor bearing only tracking is tackled. A particle based tracking algorithm is derived and a new filter initialization scheme is introduced for the specific task of multi-sensor bearing only tracking. Simulated data is used to study the efficiency and performance of the initialization scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.337
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor NetworksFrench-language works237,207