ACRL Board of Directors’ actions, June 2003: Highlights of the Board’s Annual Conference meetings
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
in Toronto, the ACRL Board of Direc tors met on June 21 and 24 and took the actions.The actions appear here along with the strategic directions that they ad fodres ll o w i n g s.Strategic Direction 1.0: Society recognizes the contributions that academic and research libraries and librarians make in higher education, scholarly communication, and civic development.Approved Rinding of $5,000 for library workshops Awards and recognitionA p p ro ved a re so lu tio n th a n k in g K ate C o rb y and EBSS for their leadership and dedicated ef forts to preserve the value of ERIC as a resource for the educational community. A p p ro v e d a re s o lu tio n c o n g ra tu la tin g an dthanking LES and DLS for their work in develop ing a mission and strategic plan that meets die needs of their respective members and that moves for ward the work of the sections and the association.for Council of Independent College institutions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it