MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4241524521 · doi:10.36198/9783838586762

Familienrechtspsychologie

2016· book· de· W4241524521 on OpenAlex
Harry Dettenborn, Eginhard Walter

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languagede
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychology, Coaching, and Therapy
Canadian institutionsHatch (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyPolitical scienceGynecologyHumanitiesMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wenn familiäre Konflikte vor Gericht gelöst werden müssen, ist psychologische Kompetenz für alle beteiligten Berufsgruppen unverzichtbar. Das vorliegende Buch macht den Leser vertraut mit den rechtlichen Grundlagen und der psychologischen Tragweite einzelner Konfliktthemen wie Sorgerecht, Umgangsrecht, Adoption oder Herausnahme von Kindern aus der Familie. Es zeigt anschaulich, wie diese theoretischen Grundkenntnisse in die Praxis der Jugendhilfe, Verfahrenspflege, Beratung und Gutachtertätigkeit eingebracht werden können.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.215
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0050.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1090.223

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPsychology, Coaching, and TherapyFrench-language works237,207