Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Tenth IEEE International Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing with Applications (ISPA 2012) was held in Leganes, Spain, July 10-13 2012. ISPA 2012 is the next event in a series of highly successful symposia on parallel and distributed computing and networking, previously held as ISPA 2011 (Busan, Korea), ISPA 2010 (Taipei, Taiwan), ISPA 2009 (Chengdu, China), ISPA 2008 (Sydney, Australia), ISPA 2007 (Niagara Falls, Canada), ISPA 2006 (Sorrento, Italy), ISPA 2005 (Nanjing, China), ISPA 2004 (Hong Kong), and ISPA 2003 (Aizu, Japan). This year the value, breadth, and depth of the ISPA symposium continues to strengthen and grow in importance for both the academic and industrial communities. This strength is evidenced this year by having a high number of submissions resulting in a selective program. In addition, the publishing of special issues from several high quality journals from Elsevier, Springer and Oxford make this symposium stronger.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".