MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Error in Author Affiliation

2020· erratum· en· W4241572379 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
George Hripcsak, Steven Shea, Martijn J. Schuemie

Bibliographic record

VenueJAMA Internal Medicine · 2020
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJanssen Research and DevelopmentNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteHealth Resources and Services Administration
KeywordsMedicineHydrochlorothiazideChlorthalidoneQuarter (Canadian coin)Internal medicineDiureticBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a recent Letter to the Editor1 titled “Clinical Uncertainty,” published online June 15, 2020, in JAMA Internal Medicine, the author affiliation for Farzad Shabani was incorrect. The correct affiliation is Queen’s Hospital, Romford, London, United Kingdom. This article has been corrected.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.117
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score0.246

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.117
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0090.017
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0740.086

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJAMA Internal MedicineSame topicBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesFrench-language works237,207