MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4241573291 · doi:10.1080/08827509908962481

The Removal of Cobalt from Zinc Electrolyte by Cementation: A Critical Review

2000· review· en· W4241573291 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review · 2000
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetal Extraction and Bioleaching
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCementation (geology)CobaltZincCobalt extraction techniquesZinc hydroxideInorganic chemistryElectrolyteChemistryElectrowinningHydrometallurgyNuclear chemistryMetallurgySulfuric acidMaterials scienceElectrode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The removal of cobalt from zinc electrolyte has been a focus of electrometallurgical research for over 20 years. This survey reviews the literature on cobalt cementation as well as zinc electrowinning and hydrogen evolution in the interest of characterizing the factors which are important in cobalt cementation by zinc dust and developing an improved purification process. The effect of speciation, the solubility of zinc hydroxide and zinc sulfate, temperature, pH, and the concentrations of reacting species, impurities, and catalytic agents are all investigated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.869
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it