MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4241581111 · doi:10.1149/ma2017-02/39/1731

Improved Electrocatalytic Activity and Durability of NiMn<sub>2</sub>O<sub>4</sub>-CNTs as Reversible Oxygen Reaction Electrocatalysts in Zinc-air Batteries

2017· article· en· W4241581111 on OpenAlexaff
Xuemei Li, Haoran Li, Qi Nie, Lei Zhang, Jinli Qiao

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMesoporous materialMaterials scienceCalcinationCatalysisCarbon fibersChemical engineeringHeteroatomNanotechnologyChemistryComposite materialOrganic chemistryComposite number

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Faced with the increasingly serious energy crisis, fuel cells, as a clean and efficient power source, have become the most promising energy conversion devices and attracted significant attention during the last decades. Oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) at the cathode of fuel cells plays a decisive role in determination of the performance, and electrocatalysts with high-performance ORR are essential for practical applications. However, some big technical challenges are still encountered due to their inherently sluggish of cathodic ORR, which usually requires a significant number of noble metal catalyst [1, 2]. To overcome these bottlenecks, great attention has been paid to pursue non-precious metal or metal-free carbonaceous materials. Mesoporous carbon materials have been used for ORR due to their preeminent textural characteristics, high surface area, mechanical stability and mesoporous structure. However, the properties of mesoporous carbon materials base on not only the sizes and loction of the pore, but the heteroatoms doped into the carbon framework. It is believed that the quantity of N-doped and S-doped in carbon will be vastly different, if it was annealed at various reaction temperatures [3]. Herein, we use N and S co-doped mesoporous carbon which is prepared by polyquaternium-7 as a starting material to investigate the reaction with N2 at various temperatures. Nitrogen and sulfur co-doped mesoporous carbons were prepared by homogeneously mixing polyquaternium-7 and ferrous sulphate and silica. After drying overnight, the resulting solid was ground to a fine powder and then calcined at 600, 700, 800, 900 and 1000 for 1 hour in a nitrogen atmosphere. The silica was washed off in excess sodium hydroxide and dried. The excess metal Fe was removed in sulfuric acid at 85 ℃. Finally, the resulting catalytic graphite was pyrolyzed at 600 to 1000 ℃ for 1 hour again. Results of electrochemical characterizations for ORR were studied by cyclic voltammetry (CV) and linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) employing rotating disk electrode (RDE) technique. It is found that the temperature of the heat treatment is a significant parameter in synthesizing the high performance ORR catalysts. References [1] M.J. Wu, J.L. Qiao, K.X. Li, X.J. Zhou, Y.Y. Liu and J.J. Zhang, Green Chem. Vol., 18,2699 (2016) [2] M. Arenz, K.J. Mayrhofer, V. Stamenkovic, B.B. Blizanac, T.Tomoyuki, P.N. Ross and N.M. Markovic, J. Am. Chem. Soc. Vol., 127,6819 (2005) [3] S.B.Yang, L.J. Zhi, K. Tang, X.L. Feng, J. Maier, K. Müllen, Adv. Funct. Mater. 22, 3634 (2012).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFrench-language works237,207