Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To be an Indian is to be a man, with all a man's needs and abilities.To be an Indian is also to be different.It is to speak different languages, draw different pictures, tell different tales and to rely on a set of values developed in a different world.Canada is richer for its Indian component, although there have been times when diversity seemed of little value to many Canadians.But to be a Canadian Indian today is to be someone different in another way.It is to be someone apart -apart in law, apart in the provision of government services and, too often, part in social contacts.To be an Indian is to lack power -the power to act as owner of your lands, the power to spend your own money and, too often, the power to change your own condition.Not always, but too often, to be an Indian is to be without -without a job, a good house, or running water; without knowledge, training or technical skill and, above all, without those feelings of dignity and self-confidence that a man must have if he is to walk with his head held high.All these conditions of the Indians are the product of history and have nothing to do with their abilities and capacities.Indian relations with other Canadians began with special treatment by government and society, and special treatment has been the rule since Europeans first settled in Canada.Special treatment has made of the Indians a community disadvantaged and apart.Obviously, the course of history must be changed.To be an Indian must be to be free -free to develop Indian cultures in an environment of legal, social and economic equality with other Canadians.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it