MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Heraldic Literature

2017· other· en· W4241624812 on OpenAlexaff
Richard J. Moll

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Encyclopedia of Medieval Literature in Britain · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Art and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeFifteenthHistoryArtClassicsLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The large corpus of heraldic writing falls into two general categories: treatises on the origins and duties of heralds and the symbolism of heraldic design; and narrative accounts of both war‐ and peace‐time events witnessed by heralds themselves. Heraldic treatises, written in French, Latin, and English, first appear in the fourteenth century, but flourished in the fifteenth century. There are several English authors (most notably Johannes de Bado Aureo and Nicholas Upton), but most heraldic treatises are anonymous translations and adaptations of French models. Heraldic narrative is similarly multilingual. Describing battles, diplomatic maneuvers, tournaments, marriages, coronations, and pageants, heraldic narratives were intended to spread detailed accounts of great events and to act as source material for civic and national chroniclers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.114
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Encyclopedia of Medieval Literature in BritainSame topicHistorical Art and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207