Real-Time Estimation of Intrinsic and Reflex Stiffness
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Joint stiffness is defined as the dynamic relationship between the position of the joint and torque acting about it. Joint stiffness is composed of two components: intrinsic and reflex stiffness. Measuring the two stiffness components cannot be done simply because the two components appear and change together. A number of approaches have been used to estimate the components, but all those approaches are inherently off-line. We have developed novel algorithm that separates and estimates the two components in real-time. Intrinsic stiffness was estimated by finding the cross-correlations between the position, its derivatives and the torque. Reflex stiffness was estimated by finding the IRF between the half-wave rectified velocity and the estimated reflex torque. A novel position perturbation, consisting of pseudo random series of pulses of different lengths, was used to eliminate covariance of intrinsic and reflex stiffness estimates. Using simulated data, the real-time estimates were shown to be estimated accurately. The real-time estimation algorithm was validated by comparing the real-time estimates with estimates generated by the parallel-cascade identification, an established off-line intrinsic and reflex stiffness identification algorithm, using simulated and experimental data. The estimates produced by the two algorithms were in agreement for both simulated and experimental data
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it