Bibliographic record
Abstract
Over the past decade, a significant body of work has explored the impact of neoliberal globalization (Rizvi & Engel, 2009) on all levels of education. The focus of much scholarship on adult literacy in advanced capitalist nations has been to critique the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) project to explicitly link literacy to economic productivity through surveys starting with the 1994 International Adult Literacy Survey (IALS). For example, Walker (2009) asserts that OECD framing of literacy operates as the ideology of “inclusive liberalism” and Rubenson (2008) argues that indicators such as the IALS have been used to “manufacture a consensus” that “more strongly integrate[s] education into the core of labour market and economic agendas” (p. 257). Darville (1999) points out that, by measuring sight-reading ability, IALS constructs literacy as “the counterpoint of flexibility as labour force attribute” (p. 280) which will increase productivity and national competitiveness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".