MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Button battery ingestion and insertion by children—an international approach to an emerging dangerous injury

2012· article· en· W4241691776 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Eric Chalmers

Bibliographic record

VenueInjury Prevention · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicForeign Body Medical Cases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBattery (electricity)IngestionPoison controlForensic engineeringInjury preventionEngineeringSuicide preventionOccupational safety and healthHuman factors and ergonomicsMedical emergencyAeronauticsMedicinePhysicsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Seminar will include a variety of presenters, on behalf of • Product safety regulators—USA, Australia, New Zealand, Korea, Japan • Community organisations—Safe Kids Worldwide, Safe Kids USA, Safe Kids Canada, Safekids NZ, Kidsafe in Australia • Paediatricians will outline the nature and consequences of ingestion or insertion • Research—Queensland Injury Surveillance Unit; Safe Kids Worldwide and Fleishman; Australian Competition and Consumer Commission Each presenter will outline a brief summary of issues and implications from their work in the area. Background Extensive cooperative work is being undertaken internationally at regulatory, community and industry levels to address this emerging cause of severe injury. This, like many developing issues, is complex. The problem arises from the misuse of batteries (often unnoticed) by young children who were never intended to have access to them; community awareness is very low; data is difficult and misdiagnosis easy; the result can be catastrophic and deadly; containing the risk is complex. Aims/Objectives The Seminar will address all three themes for the Conference and provide a round table discussion on the issue; lessons from work to date; and next steps in addressing the trends internationally—to synthesise the issue and consider the implications for ongoing efforts. Structure of Seminar • Introduction and outline • Outline of the Battery Controlled Programme and history • Input and implications from research • A medical profession perspective • Industry issues and actions • Community awareness campaign • Regulatory responses • Summary and conclusion Results The Seminar will demonstrate • How Governments, the medical profession, researchers, community groups and industry are working together to find practical solutions to the issue and benefits of this approach; • A variety of research issues; work to overcome these; and how research has been put to immediate use in the Programme; • Development of a successful awareness Programme and how this has started to be transported across countries and cultures; • The process of addressing complex regulatory and standards issues impacting many areas. Significance The Seminar' significance lies in • Demonstration of the capacity to address emerging issues quickly when regulators, community organisations, researchers and industry work together • An international opportunity to consider progress in addressing this emerging risk to children and the key next steps.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.006
Scholarly communication0.0060.008
Open science0.0020.010
Research integrity0.0060.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInjury PreventionSame topicForeign Body Medical CasesFrench-language works237,207