MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The Factors Affecting Small Bowel Volume in the Pelvis of Patients Receiving Radiotherapy for Rectal Cancer

2017· article· en· W4241713471 on OpenAlexaff
Junliang Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Case Reports and Case Studies · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsCancerCare Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePelvisRadiation therapyVolume (thermodynamics)Colorectal cancerCancerRadiologyGeneral surgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: Radiation (RT)-Induced Gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities are associated the small bowel volume irradiated and the dosage received.However, rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) experience less GI toxicities compared to adjuvant chemoradiotherapy.The purpose of this study was to explore the factors which are associated with the small bowel volume in the pelvic radiation fields. Materials and methods:Patients with rectal cancer who had pre-or post-surgery CRT and were treated by a single radiation oncologist were included.All patients were treated with 3-D conformal radiotherapy.The volume of the organs was determined from planning CT scans.Acute toxicity was graded using Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Common Toxicity Criteria.Acute GI toxicity and its associated determinants such as age, bladder volume, gender, Body Mass Index (BMI), and type of surgery were documented.Results: A total of 119 patients (71 males, 48 females) 35 to 88 years of age were recruited.Sixty one out of 119 patients had pre-surgery RT or CRT and 58 patients had post-surgery therapy.Single predictors for greater irradiated small bowel volume were post-surgery treatment, female sex, smaller bladder volume and older age.The small bowel volume tended to increase with lower BMI and abdominoperineal resection.Multivariate analysis indicated that post-surgery treatment, being a female, and having a smaller bladder volume were predictors of greater irradiated volume of the small bowel.Conclusion: Factors such as pelvic surgery, being female, flat bladder, and older age are associated with increased small bowel volumes in pelvis.These would increase the irradiated small bowel volumes in patients receiving radiotherapy for rectal cancer.Therefore, giving radiotherapy before the surgery or using technical such as IMRT or Rapid Arc to avoid or reduce the small bowel volumes being irradiated is warranted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.196
GPT teacher head0.405
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Case Reports and Case Studies→Same topicCultural and Historical Studies→French-language works237,207→