Bibliographic record
Abstract
Conformément à l'article 171.1 du Code, le Ministre du travail référait au Conseil le différend opposant la Banque Royale du Canada et les employés de six de ses succursales et trois syndicats affiliés à la Centrale des Syndicats Nationaux. Après avoir examiné l'ensemble de la preuve, le Conseil, par décision majoritaire, en est venu à la conclusion qu'il n'y avait pas lieu d'imposer une première convention collective. Syndicat des employés de commerce et de bureau du comté Lapointe (CSN), Syndicat des commis comptables d'Alma Inc. (CSN) et Syndicat des employés de commerce de la Baie (CSN) et Banque Royale du Canada, six succursales de la région du Saguenay-Lac St-Jean. Dossiers 675-6 à 675-11; décision du 18 juillet 1980, motifs de décision communiqués le 18 septembre 1980 (no 267);Panel du Conseil: Me Marc Lapointe, président, Me Claude Foisy, vice-président et M. Jacques Archambault, membre (ce dernier était dissident).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.025 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.020 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.017 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.014 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".