MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4241787059 · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139031691.035

Norway

2014· book-chapter· en· W4241787059 on OpenAlexaff
Are Herrem, Per Arne Dæhli

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2014
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCorporate Governance and Law
Canadian institutionsSelkirk College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDirectiveNorwegianParliamentLawPolitical scienceDirective on Privacy and Electronic CommunicationsBusinessEuropean Union lawData Protection DirectiveEuropean unionComputer sciencePhilosophyInternational trade

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Implementation and scope The Second Company Law Directive (Directive 77/91/EEC, as amended by Directive 92/101/EEC) was implemented into Norwegian law by the Act of 22 December 1995 No 80. The Norwegian parliament has given its consent to inclusion of the amendments introduced by Directive 2006/68/EC in the EEA Agreement, but the exemptions provided for in the Directive have not been implemented into Norwegian law. The scope of the Second Company Law Directive is limited to public limited liability companies. According to the EEA Agreement, the allmennaksjeselskap (“ASA”) is the public limited liability company under Norwegian law to which the Directive applies. The Norwegian legislature has, to a large degree, resolved similar rules in relation to aksjeselskap (“AS”), the private limited liability company under Norwegian law. These two types of limited liability companies are governed by different acts. The Norwegian Public Limited Companies Act of 13 June 1997 (“the PLC Act”) applies only to companies with limited liability which are described as allmennaksjeselskap in the articles of association and registered as such in the Norwegian Register of Business Enterprises. The following description of Norwegian law relates only to ASAs and the PLC Act.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.276
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2760.139

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.165
Teacher spread0.146 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooksSame topicCorporate Governance and LawFrench-language works237,207