MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4241848390 · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(21)00363-6

The continuing need for a Day of Indigenous Peoples

2021· editorial· en· W4241848390 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
The Lancet Global Health

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Global Health · 2021
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousNeglectPopulationColonialismHuman rightsGovernment (linguistics)GeographyMedicinePolitical scienceGender studiesSociologyEnvironmental healthLawPsychiatryEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As if to provide a timely reminder of the atrocities experienced by Indigenous people, this UN International Day of the World's Indigenous Peoples (Aug 9) follows the horrifying discoveries of the remains of Indigenous children near to former residential schools in BC, Canada. Around 150 000 Indigenous children were forcibly taken from their families to attend these government-funded schools between 1883 and 1996, which aimed to strip them of their culture and subjected them to severe abuse and neglect.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.036
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.083

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.036
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.010
Scholarly communication0.0150.014
Open science0.0040.007
Research integrity0.0290.044
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.349 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet Global HealthSame topicIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsFrench-language works237,207