MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4241848554 · doi:10.24908/ijesjp.v2i1.4744

Editor's Introduction

2013· article· en· W4241848554 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jens Kabo

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Engineering Social Justice and Peace · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicInterdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPraxisUnpackingFoundation (evidence)EpistemologySociologyAction (physics)Critical reflectionDimension (graph theory)Economic JusticeEngineering ethicsPolitical sciencePhilosophyLawEngineeringPedagogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Each of the three articles in this issue can be seen to highlight a different dimension of the concept of praxis. Muscat emphasises action, Baillie and Levine exemplify the use of theory as a basis for unpacking dominant paradigms and assumptions, and Cumming-Potvin and Currie emphasise critical reflection. Taken together, these articles provide a robust foundation for understanding the nature of praxis as engineers engage with issues of social justice and peace.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.047
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score0.305

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.047
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0100.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0910.048

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Engineering Social Justice and PeaceSame topicInterdisciplinary Research and CollaborationFrench-language works237,207