L'influence de la mémoire de la Révolution française et de l'Empire napoléonien dans l'opinion publique française face à la guerre d'Espagne de 1823
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Kôbô Seigan, Memories of the French Revolution and Napoleonic Empire and their Impact on French Public Opinion at the Time of the Spanish War of 1823 The war against revolutionary Spain enthralled the French press under the Restoration. The liberal newspaper Le Constitutionnel was hostile to the war, while the ultra La Quotidienne was in favour. Both discussed the issue by referring to official texts, private letters, English newspapers and even papers from the opposite camp. Moreover, the war rekindled memories of the French Revolution and the Empire. The Constitutionnels version, however, was ambivalent. It separated the Revolution from the Terror and favoured the former to the detriment of Napoleon, thus doing nothing to encourage Bonapartism. It also dwelt on the importance of forgetting the past. For La Quotidienne, the Napoleonic period was subsumed in the Revolution. Its logic was simple but powerful. Besides, it succeeded in becoming a "mouthpiece" for those who had fallen for the nation and criticized the liberals for being unpatriotic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".