MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4241910945 · doi:10.1525/001c.12721

THE SECOND CONVIVIALIST MANIFESTO: Towards a Post-Neoliberal World

2020· article· en· W4241910945 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Convivialist International

Bibliographic record

VenueCivic Sociology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversité de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-YvelinesConservatoire National des Arts et MétiersUniversidad Alberto HurtadoFilhaUniversidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroUniversité du Québec à MontréalTshwane University of TechnologyUniversité de Bretagne OccidentaleCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversidade Federal de PernambucoUniversité de FribourgMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulInstitut Universitaire de FranceUniversità degli Studi di FirenzeBar-Ilan UniversityUniversidad de Santiago de ChileUniversity of OxfordUniversidade de PernambucoUniversity of CambridgeÉcole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences SocialesConcordia UniversityUniversità degli Studi di MilanoPrinceton UniversityMcGill UniversityLondon School of Economics and Political ScienceUniversidade de CoimbraUniversité Catholique de Louvain
KeywordsManifestoHubrisNeoliberalism (international relations)HumanismPoliticsPolitical scienceDeclarationPolitical philosophySociologyPolitical economyLawPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As a sequel to the Convivialist Manifesto: A Declaration of Interdependence (2013), The Second Convivialist Manifesto: Towards a Post-Neoliberal World was originally published in French and signed by three hundred intellectuals from thirty-three countries. Convivialism is a broad-based humanist, civic, and political philosophy that spells out the normative principles that sustain the art of living together at the beginning of the twenty-first century. Over and against neoliberalism, productivism, and populism, it values relations of cooperation that allow humans to compete with each other without hubris and violence, by taking care of one another and nature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.667
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCivic SociologySame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207