MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4241934779 · doi:10.1080/09592290008406151

Book reviews

2000· article· en· W4241934779 on OpenAlexaff
Antony Best, Greg Kennedy, Martin Thomas, E. R. Johnson, Kendrick Oliver, Ryan C. Hendrickson

Bibliographic record

VenueDiplomacy and Statecraft · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiplomacyState (computer science)ChapelPower (physics)Political scienceAppeasementEconomic historyHistoryLawPoliticsArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

B.J.C. McKercher, Transition of Power: Britain's Loss of Global Pre‐eminence to the United States, 1930–45, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999, xii + 403, £40, ISBN 0521 440 904 Joseph A. Maiolo, The Royal Navy and Nazi Germany, 1933–39: A Study in Appeasement and the Origins of the Second World War (London, MacMillan Press Ltd., 1998), xii + 259 pp. £?? ISBN 0–333–72007–5. William I. Hitchcock, France Restored: Cold War Diplomacy and the Quest for Leadership in Europe, 1944–54, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, 1998, pp.291. £37.50 hardback, £14.50 paperback. R. Holland, Britain and the Revolt in Cyprus 1954–1959 (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1998). 347 pp. £48 hb. ISBN 0–19–820538–4. Michael L. Krenn, Black Diplomacy: African Americans and the State Department 1945–1969 (London: M.E. Sharpe, 1999). Viii + 223pp. £15.95 pb. ISBN 0–7656–0381–0 Jerrold L. Schecter, Russian Negotiating Behavior (Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press, 1998). 225 pp. ISBN: 1–878379–78‐X.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.548
Threshold uncertainty score0.645

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5480.560

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiplomacy and StatecraftSame topicHistorical and Contemporary Political DynamicsFrench-language works237,207