MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4241977703 · doi:10.1149/osf.io/36kg2

Electrocatalytic hydrogenation of guaiacol in diverse electrolytes using a slurry reactor

2019· preprint· en· W4241977703 on OpenAlexaff
Yanuar Philip Wijaya

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGuaiacolCyclohexanolHydrogenolysisChemistryCatalysisSlurryFaraday efficiencyPerchloric acidInorganic chemistryElectrolyteElectrocatalystChemical engineeringElectrochemistryOrganic chemistryMaterials scienceElectrode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electrocatalytic hydrogenation-hydrogenolysis (ECH) of guaiacol was performed in an H-cell type of slurry reactor configuration with Pt/C catalyst. Different pairs of electrolytes, in catholyte-anolyte combinations, were investigated by constant potential chronocoulometry, showing that the acidic anolyte is preferable for an effective ECH. The advantages of this slurry reactor are mainly attributed to the enhanced Faradaic efficiency and recoverability of the catalyst. High guaiacol conversion (>90%) can be achieved at mild conditions (307 K, 1 atm) in perchloric acid solution (0.5 M), resulting in 54% cyclohexanol selectivity at moderate Faradaic efficiency (53%) and low catalyst loading. This work opens up the possibility of renewable synthesis of valuable chemicals from biomass-derived substrates via electrocatalytic reduction process at mild conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion→French-language works237,207→