Bibliographic record
Abstract
Paul Michael Lützeler. Transatlantische Germanistik. Kontakt, Transfer, Dialogik, reviewed by russell a. berman Albrecht Koschorke. Wahrheit und Erfindung: Grundzüge einer Allgemeinen Erzähltheorie, reviewed by stephan jaeger Ricarda Bauschke, Sebastian Coxon, and Martin H. Jones, eds. Sehen und Sichtbarkeit in der Literatur des deutschen Mittelalters, reviewed by kathryn starkey Anja Rathmann-Lutz, ed. Visibilität des Unsichtbaren. Sehen und Verstehen in Mittelalter und Früher Neuzeit, reviewed by kathryn starkey Caroline Huey. Hans Folz and Print Culture in Late Medieval Germany: The Creation of Popular Discourse, reviewed by jonathan green Angelica Fenner. Race under Reconstruction in German Cinema: Robert Stemmle’s Toxi, reviewed by jaimey fisher Sinéad Crowe. Religion in Contemporary German Drama: Botho Strauß, George Tabori, Werner Fritsch, and Lukas Bärfuss, reviewed by sun-young kim
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.332 | 0.349 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".