MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

El no-lugar de la teoría literaria

2016· article· es· W4242022376 on OpenAlexaff
Eduardo Subirats

Bibliographic record

VenuePoligramas · 2016
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterature, Culture, and Aesthetics
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En el siguiente documento se presenta un crítica a la cultura literaria contemporánea partiendo del análisis de la obra O lugar da teoría literaria (Andre Cechinel), en la que se plantea el mercado de la cultura como caso de " la servidumbre intelectual voluntaria", instaurada a partir de la auto-negación de la conciencia reflexiva. Todo lo anterior a partir tres obras ejemplares de la conciencia intelectual del siglo veinte: Molloy, Der Process y Pedro Páramo. Se centrará en la categoría subjetiva y ontológica de voluntad, teniendo en cuenta la voluntad artística como la esencia de la obra de arte. Así las cosas, la teoría, asunto central dentro de esta crítica, sería un devenir consciente de la voluntad artística de comprender y transformar el mundo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.027
Scholarly communication0.0130.007
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePoligramasSame topicLiterature, Culture, and AestheticsFrench-language works237,207