MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4242028565 · doi:10.21273/hortsci.39.7.1778

`Cabot' Strawberry

2004· article· en· W4242028565 on OpenAlexaffabout
A.R. Jamieson, N.L. Nickerson, Charles F. Forney, K.A. Sanford, K.R. Sanderson, J.-P. Privé, R.J.A. Tremblay, P. Hendrickson

Bibliographic record

VenueHortScience · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBerry genetics and cultivation research
Canadian institutionsGovernment of New BrunswickGovernment of Newfoundland and LabradorAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHorticultureBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Additional index words.Fragaria ×ananassa, Phytophthora fragariae, fruit size, fruit breeding 'Cabot' strawberry (Fragaria ×ananassa Duchesne) was commercially introduced in Canada in June, 1998 by the Atlantic Food and Horticulture Research Centre of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.'Cabot' ripens in late midseason, offering growers an alternative to 'Mira' and 'Jewel' with larger berries.Plants of 'Cabot' are large and produce fewer runners than 'Mira'.Plants are resistant to red stele root rot disease (incited by Phytophthora fragariae Hickman var.fragariae) and several leaf diseases.The name 'Cabot' is signifi cant in Atlantic Canada as it commemorates John Cabot, the Venetian explorer whose Englishbacked voyage arrived in the region in 1497.Origin 'Cabot', tested as K92-17, is a seedling from a K87-5 x K86-19 cross made under the Mills, Kings Co., N.S., in Spring 1991 and 'Cabot' was selected for its very large fruit in July 1992 by A.R.J.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.221
Threshold uncertainty score0.741

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2210.023

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHortScienceSame topicBerry genetics and cultivation researchFrench-language works237,207