MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4242062912 · doi:10.24908/iqurcp.7878

11. MEMS Seed Sorting Mechanism

2017· article· en· W4242062912 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Marc Burnie

Bibliographic record

VenueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMagnetic and Electromagnetic Effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSortingMicroelectromechanical systemsDielectrophoresisProcess engineeringComputer scienceSelection (genetic algorithm)Process (computing)NanotechnologyMechanical engineeringBiochemical engineeringElectronic engineeringMaterials scienceEngineeringMicrofluidicsArtificial intelligenceAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Seed sorting is an essential task in agriculture for maintaining the quality and purity of the yield. The current method for sorting seeds in the 50-200μm range is both tedious and inefficient. To increase productivity in the micro-scale an autonomous process using dielectrophoresis (DEP) selection techniques has been employed. By applying a controlled electric field, the seeds can be differentiated depending on their size and dielectric properties. Using existing Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) technology, a preliminary working design was fabricated to prove the viability of the concept. Future iterations of the model will utilize counters and be fully automated with the ultimate objective of bringing the design to market.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference ProceedingsSame topicMagnetic and Electromagnetic EffectsFrench-language works237,207