MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4242065833 · doi:10.1109/28.913706

Ratings of semiconductors for AC drives

2001· article· en· W4242065833 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industry Applications · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Power Systems and Control
Canadian institutionsRockwell Automation (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInsulated-gate bipolar transistorThyristorGate turn-off thyristorPower semiconductor deviceCurrent injection techniqueElectrical engineeringDiodeTransistorBipolar junction transistorSafe operating areaSemiconductor deviceTRIACMOS-controlled thyristorPower (physics)VoltageMaterials scienceElectronic engineeringEngineeringIntegrated gate-commutated thyristorPhysicsGate oxide

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper discusses the characteristics and limitations of various power semiconductors used in motor controls and drives. Semiconductor types discussed include the insulated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT), transistor (bipolar and MOS device), SCR, gate-turn-off transistor (thyristor) (GTO), and diode. Important limitations, including voltage rating, current ratings, safe operating area, heat transfer characteristics, and limitations due to a particular device characteristic are discussed. The focus is on the IGBT; its advantages and disadvantages are discussed, as well as how it can be rated in a drive application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.923
Threshold uncertainty score0.486

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it