MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4242086536 · doi:10.4095/306541

Downscaling SMOS/SMAP soil moisture product using high resolution Radarsat-2 SAR data: a case study in southern Ontario

2018· report· en· W4242086536 on OpenAlexaffabout
J Li, Shusen Wang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil Moisture and Remote Sensing
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDownscalingRemote sensingEnvironmental scienceHigh resolutionWater contentSynthetic aperture radarMeteorologyPrecipitationGeographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Current soil moisture products derived from SMOS and SMAP satellites have very coarse resolutions (~40km). This limits the soil moisture products for applications where a resolution of 1-10 km is generally needed (e.g. hydro-climatological applications). To obtain high resolution soil moisture, an algorithm was developed to downscale SMOS/SMAP products by using multi-temporal dual-polarized (HH and HV) C-band SAR images. Recently the use of full-polarized (FP) SAR data was reported to improve soil moisture retrieval even under dense vegetation canopy, but FP SAR data has the disadvantage of narrow swath, which limits its applications for soil moisture estimates over large areas. With the Radarsat Constellation Mission (RCM) becoming operational in 2018, it will provide compact polarimetric (CP) configurations that has a wider swath and hence is a possible alterative to the FP data. A new downscaling algorithm has been developed to improve soil moisture retrieval by using RCM-CP data, which is simulated from the Radarsat-2 FP imagery. Comparing to previous algorithm, the new algorithm can enhance the removal of vegetation effect by using a normalized scattering based empirical model, in which the conditions of vegetation are characterized by the RCM-CP derived vegetation parameter. In addition, a new mathematical model, rather than complicate wavelet transform, is used to better account for scale change. The new algorithm is validated with in-situ soil moisture data from Southern Ontario collected in the summer of 2017. When compared to results obtained from a previous algorithm there is a promising improvement in soil moisture estimation. Since the RCM will provide a short revisit time (<4 days), this study demonstrates the potential for fusing RCM data with SMOS/SMAP soil moisture (2-3 days repeat cycle) to continuously map soil moisture at higher resolutions over large areas, even under dense vegetation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.093

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoil Moisture and Remote SensingFrench-language works237,207