MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4242096098 · doi:10.4000/rsa.827

Joas Hans, Knöbl Wolfgang, War in Social Thought. Hobbes to the Present

2012· article· fr· W4242096098 on OpenAlexaff
Yves Laberge

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches sociologiques et anthropologiques · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSeventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
Canadian institutionsGDG Environnement
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyTheologyPsychoanalysisPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce livre part d’un paradoxe : la guerre est omniprésente dans les relations internationales et dans les livres d’histoire, celle-ci occupe une place considérable dans les budgets de tous les gouvernements, mais d’après les professeurs Hans Joas et Wolfgang Knöbl, cette idée même de la guerre semble relativement peu présente dans les théories sociales, comme l’indique le titre d’origine (en allemand) de ce livre qui traite d’un «problème dans l’histoire de la théorie sociale» (Ein Problem in d...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.772
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.253
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherches sociologiques et anthropologiquesSame topicSeventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical ThoughtFrench-language works237,207