MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4242107086 · doi:10.1016/j.vgie.2018.03.010

Richard A. Kozarek

2018· editorial· en· W4242107086 on OpenAlexaff
Richard A. Kozarek, Michel Kahaleh, D. Nageshwar Reddy, Todd One, Kenneth F. Binmoeller, Shayan Irani

Bibliographic record

VenueVideoGIE · 2018
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHistory of Medical Practice
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

“I was raised Polish and Catholic in a small Wisconsin town and learned early on the meaning of sin and the utility of cow shit.” This was the entirety of the requested 2000-word essay that I submitted to the American Student Medical Association, but it was enough to secure a summer internship in a medically underserved area of Appalachia. A philosophy major at the University of Wisconsin (1969), I also received my MD there (1973). I knew I was from a medical family (my father and 2 younger brothers are also MDs), but it took me by surprise that it was also a sexist family (my mother, a medical technologist, and my 3 sisters, RNs) (Author photo 1).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0060.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVideoGIESame topicHistory of Medical PracticeFrench-language works237,207