MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4242147631 · doi:10.17118/11143/18404

À la croisée du chemin Roxham et de la rhétorique politique : démystifier l’Entente sur les tiers pays sûrs

2018· article· fr· W4242147631 on OpenAlexfundvenueaboutno aff
Hélène Mayrand, Andrew Smith-Grégoire

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de droit Université de Sherbrooke · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGovernment of Canada
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accord entre le gouvernement du Canada et le gouvernement des États-Unis d'Amérique pour la coopération en matière d'examen des demandes de statut de réfugié présentées par des ressortissants de pays tiers, 5 décembre 2002, R.T.C., (entré en vigueur au Canada le 29 décembre 2004) (ci-après « Entente sur les tiers pays sûrs »). 2 Par exemple : BLOC QUÉBÉCOIS, Plateforme politique du Bloc québécois, (2019), en ligne :

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.355
Threshold uncertainty score0.715

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0120.027
Scholarly communication0.0110.006
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue de droit Université de SherbrookeSame topicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, GenderFrench-language works237,207