MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4242162370 · doi:10.26868/25222708.2019.211427

A Simplified Building Controls Environment with a Reinforcement Learning Application

2020· article· en· W4242162370 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueBuilding Simulation Conference proceedings · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityConcordia University
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsReinforcement learningHVACComputer scienceMatching (statistics)Control (management)ReinforcementEnergy consumptionBuilding automationAir conditioningControl engineeringSimulationEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper has two contributions: (1) it describes the design and implementation of a thermal network based building zone emulator environment suitable for control applications with inputs and outputs matching those of the OpenAI Gym environments; and (2) the use of the environment to train a proximal policy optimization (PPO) reinforcement learning (RL) agent to maintain comfort for a house while minimizing the HVAC system energy consumption. The building controls environment can be extended to many other cases including training agents that can be mass-applied, studying the behaviour of communities and studying occupant behaviour and comfort. The trained RL agent was compared to conventional bang-bang and proportional-integral controllers. Given the penalty weights, the RL agent was more adept at minimizing equipment cycling thus improving equipment longevity and efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.790
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it