MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4242162370 · doi:10.26868/25222708.2019.211427

A Simplified Building Controls Environment with a Reinforcement Learning Application

2020· article· en· W4242162370 on OpenAlexafffund
Vasken Dermardiros, Scott Bucking, Andreas Athienitis

Bibliographic record

VenueBuilding Simulation Conference proceedings · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityConcordia University
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsReinforcement learningHVACComputer scienceMatching (statistics)Control (management)ReinforcementEnergy consumptionBuilding automationAir conditioningControl engineeringSimulationEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper has two contributions: (1) it describes the design and implementation of a thermal network based building zone emulator environment suitable for control applications with inputs and outputs matching those of the OpenAI Gym environments; and (2) the use of the environment to train a proximal policy optimization (PPO) reinforcement learning (RL) agent to maintain comfort for a house while minimizing the HVAC system energy consumption. The building controls environment can be extended to many other cases including training agents that can be mass-applied, studying the behaviour of communities and studying occupant behaviour and comfort. The trained RL agent was compared to conventional bang-bang and proportional-integral controllers. Given the penalty weights, the RL agent was more adept at minimizing equipment cycling thus improving equipment longevity and efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBuilding Simulation Conference proceedingsSame topicBuilding Energy and Comfort OptimizationFrench-language works237,207